S&P downgrades ratings of KazTransOil from "ВВВ-" to "ВВ+", outlook negative
20.02.15 17:05
/Standard & Poor's, Moscow, February 19, 15, KASE heading/ Standard & Poor's
Ratings Services said that it lowered its long-term corporate credit ratings on
Kazakhstan-based oil pipeline operator KazTransOil (KTO) to 'BB+' from 'BBB-'.
The outlook is negative.
The rating actions follow the downgrades of Kazakhstan on Feb. 9, 2015 (see
"Kazakhstan Long-Term Ratings Lowered To 'BBB' From 'BBB+' Following Oil
Price Decline; Outlook Negative," published on RatingsDirect) and
KazMunayGas NC JSC(KMG) on Feb. 16, 2015 (see "Kazakhstan-Based Oil
Company KazMunayGas Ratings Lowered To 'BB+' After Sovereign Downgrade;
Outlook Negative"). The downgrade of KTO reflects our view that its rating is
capped at the level of that on KMG, KTO's status as a "strategically important"
subsidiary of the KMG group, and our view that there is a high likelihood that
KTO would receive timely and sufficient extraordinary support in the event of
financial stress. We assume that this would likely come directly from the
government, rather than from the parent. Therefore, we determine the corporate
credit rating on KTO based on its stand-alone credit profile (SACP) plus uplift
for potential government support. In accordance with our group rating
methodology, the rating on KTO is currently capped by the rating on its parent,
KMG. We currently assess KMG's SACP as 'b'.
KTO's "strategically important" status within the KMG group and its importance
to the government of Kazakhstan are underpinned, in our view, by the company's
role as the main oil pipeline network operator in the country. We consider KTO's
role for the government to be "very important" and the link between the company
and the government to be "strong," albeit indirect.
We currently assess KTO's SACP as 'bb+' based on our "fair" business risk
profile and "modest" financial risk profile assessments of the company. KTO has
a solid market position and limited competiti were to undertake new investment projects
requiring significant external borrowing, resulting in weakened credit measures
(for instance, the debt/EBITDA ratio sustainably exceeding 1.5x without plans
from the company to improve metrics), or if we were to see substantial
unfavorable changes in new contracts with customers. However, we note that if
the local currency sovereign rating on Kazakhstan stays at 'BBB', KMG's rating
remains 'BB+', and our views of KTO's likelihood of state support and group
status are unchanged, we would have to revise the SACP of KTO down to as low
as 'b+' to trigger the rating downgrade. That might stem from a substantial
increase in leverage on the back of heavy investments or dividends to levels
commensurate with aggressive financial risk profile (with debt/EBITDA exceeding
4x, for instance) or a significant deterioration in liquidity, which is
currently not a part of our base-case scenario.
Indications of weaker support or negative interference from the parent or the
state could also put pressure on the rating. The rating on KTO does not
currently benefit from any uplift for the government support as its SACP is
'bb+', so any downgrade following such negative interference would be the
result of weaker credit metrics.
Upside scenario
We would be unlikely to revise the outlook on KTO back to stable unless we took
a similar action on the parent company.
Primary Credit Analyst:
Sergei Gorin, Moscow (7) 495-783-4132;
sergei.gorin@standardandpoors.com
Secondary Contact:
Elena Anankina, Moscow (7) 495-783-4130;
elena.anankina@standardandpoors.com
[2015-02-20]