Moody's снизило долгосрочный рейтинг АО "Ипотечная организация "Казахстанская Ипотечная Компания" до уровня "В2", прогноз "Негативный"
29.09.11 17:10
/Moody's Investors Service, Лондон, 29.09.11, перевод и заголовок KASE/ -
Рейтинговое агентство Moody's Investors Service сегодня понизило с B1 до
B2 долгосрочный рейтинг эмитента в национальной валюте Казахстанской
Ипотечной Компании (КИК), эмитента, связанного с правительством.
Прогноз по рейтингу эмитента B2 - негативный.
Рейтинг эмитента включает слабую оценку базовой кредитоспособности
(BCA), 16 (из 15), по шкале от 1 до 21, где 1 представляет наименьший
кредитный риск - в соответствии с методикой GRI присвоения рейтингов
Moody's.
Ниже приводится оригинальный текст сообщения Moody's на английском
языке.
London, 29 September 2011 - Moody's Investors Service has today downgraded
to B2 from B1 the long-term local currency issuer rating of Kazakhstan Mortgage
Company (KMC) - a Government-Related Issuer (GRI). The outlook on the B2
issuer rating is negative. The issuer rating now incorporates a weaker Baseline
Credit Assessment (BCA) of 16 (from 15) on a scale of 1 to 21, where 1
represents lowest credit risk - in accordance with Moody's GRI rating
methodology.
RATINGS RATIONALE
The downgrade of KMC's long-term issuer rating to B2 from B1 was triggered by
the deterioration of the company's credit profile, and particularly reflects:
(i) ongoing recurring losses that increased in the first six months of 2011
following the deterioration of the company's net interest margin (NIM) which was
negative (-0.95%) in H1 2011; (ii) further erosion of the shareholders' equity
that shrunk by 5% in H1 2011; and (iii) in Moody's view, the unclear prospects
of the company's business profile given the ongoing reduction of KMC's loan book
for the third successive year since 2009 (in the first six months of 2011, the
gross loan book declined by 4.3%, compared with a 9.9% decline in 2010 and
a 3.3% decline in 2009).
Moody's believes that the ongoing deterioration of KMC's financial fundamentals
is eroding the company's capital, and renders the sustainability of its business
potentially vulnerable in the long-term horizon.
At the same time, KMC's B2 rating is supported by the (i) currently high level
of capital adequacy whereby the Basel I Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio was 26% as
at end-June 2011, and (ii) reasonable cushion of liquid assets (including cash,
deposits with banks and securities), which accounts for 38% of the company's
total assets as at end-June 2011 that - along with limited repayments of
wholesale funding over the next 12 months - positively affects KMC's liquidity
position in the short to medium term.
The re-mapping of KMC's BCA down to 16 from 15 (in accordance with Moody's
GRI methodology), along with Moody's assessment of a moderate level of
government support that is incorporated into KMC's rating, corresponds to the
long-term issuer rating of B2. The negative outlook on the B2 rating reflects
the ongoing deterioration of the company's financial fundamentals mentioned
above.
PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY
The principal methodology used in this rating was Government-Related Issuers:
Methodology Update published in July 2010. Please see the Credit Policy page
on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
Headquartered in Almaty, Kazakhstan, KMC reported unaudited IFRS total
assets of KZT103.5 billion (US$708 million) and shareholders' equity of KZT20.4
billion (US$140 million) as of end-June 2011. The reported net loss for the
first six months of 2011 amounted KZT1.2 billion (US$8 million).
SOURCES
(1) Source: Unaudited interim IFRS financial statements for the six-month period
ended 30 June 2011
(2) Source: Audited Consolidated IFRS financial statements for the year ended
31 December 2010
(3) Source: Unaudited interim IFRS financial statements for the six-month period
ended 30 June 2010
(4) Source: Audited Consolidated IFRS financial statements for the year ended
31 December 2009
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this
announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating
of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of
debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from
existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued
on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory
disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in
relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit
ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this
announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the
provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be
assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the
transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the
definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further
information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the
respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
The rating has been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and
issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following: parties
involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, public information,
and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity,
obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in
assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers
to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources.
However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently
verify or validate information received in the rating process.
Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible
Service(s) to the rated entity or its related third parties within the three
years preceding the credit rating action. Please see the special report
"Ancillary or other permissible services provided to entities rated by MIS's EU
credit rating agencies" on the ratings disclosure page on our website
www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page
on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating
category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last
rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before
Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available.
Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and
accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the
ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating
analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Semyon Isakov
Asst Vice President - Analyst
Financial Institutions Group
Moody's Investors Service Limited,
Moscow Branch
7th floor, Four Winds Plaza
21 1st Tverskaya-Yamskaya St.
Moscow 125047
Russia
Telephone: +7 495 228 6060
Facsimile: +7 495 228 6091
Yves Lemay
MD - Banking
Financial Institutions Group
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service Ltd.
One Canada Square
Canary Wharf
London E14 5FA
United Kingdom
JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456
SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454
[2011-09-29]