CIS economy grows quickly but not stably - EBRD
18.11.03 00:00
/REUTERS, Moscow, Maksim Filimonov, November 18, 03/ - Economic growth
in CIS countries in the year 2003 is forecasted on the level of 6.2% in
comparison with 4.8 in 2002, however it still depends on high prices for
natural resources, and governments not hold structural reforms able to reduce
this dependence not actively enough.
The next report of Transition Report prepared by the European bank for
reconstruction and development and dedicated to shifting of central and East
European countries to market economy says about it.
"Reforms in all CIS countries were prevented by institutional problems, weak
possibilities for holding reforms on all levels of authority, and also often by
absence of political will", - says the report.
European bank, which is one of the largest investors in East European countries
and CIS countries, has conditionally divided CIS countries into two groups -
rich with natural resources - first of all, energy carriers - and which have no
big reserves of treasurers of the soil. The first group according to the bank's
information comprises Russia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan.
EBRD has fixed the growing dependence of "oil countries" on energy carriers,
despite all their efforts to diversify economy. Thus, stake of oil and gas in
Russia in export rose in the year 2002 up to 52.5% from 41% in 1999, in
Kazakhstan - up to 50.6% from 35.5%, in Azerbaijan - up to 88.8% from 78.1%.
In Russia stake of oil and gas sector in GDP in the year 2002 rose not so much
as in 1999 - to 16.3% from 16.0%, and in other "oil" countries growth of
dependence is bigger. In Kazakhstan this indicator rose in the year 2002 up to
21.1% from 12.9, and in Azerbaijan - up to 33.6% from 17.5. At that, almost in
all countries there is high payment balance because of high inflows from oil
export.
"Management of macroeconomic risks concerned with currency inflow -
pressure upon inflation and real exchange rate - and also not stable position
of budget's revenues, perhaps, is the main trial for these countries in the
mid-term outlook ", - EBRD's report says.
In the opinion of the bank's analysts, these countries have rather limited
possibilities for sterilization of excessive monetary liquidity at the national
markets in accordance with insufficient development of banks and small number
of financial instruments.
"Until the possibilities for tying excessive liquidity are limited, and there
is almost no ways to sterilize money supply, clear effect from foreign currency
inflow will result in growth of inflation pressure and weaken competitive
ability of non-raw stuff sector, that as the result will worsen perspectives of
economy diversification ", - says the report.
Besides, it's necessary to struggle against temptation to increase budget's
expenses in presence of high oil prices: in case they fall the reverse
reduction of expenses seems to be difficult. The problem can be partially
solved by stabilizing funds, which have been founded almost in all "oil
countries" for accumulation of additional revenues from energy resources
extraction.
However, in EBRD's opinion, in order that such the funds be more effective they
must be transparent and included in the general budget system. Besides, state
should necessarily develop financial sector more actively for more efficient
redistribution of oil inflows in the economy and stimulation of non-raw stuff
sector's growth.
EBRD forecasts that economic growth in Russia in the year 2003 will be 6.2% in
comparison with 4.3% in 2002, in Kazakhstan - 9.0% (9.5), in Azerbaijan - 9.4%
(10.6).
WHO HAS NO OIL
EBRD writes that economic growth rates in "non-oil" countries are preserved on
high level. Thus, in Armenia and Tajikistan record is fixed for the second year
one after another - 10% that is concerned with goods development of industrial
sector.
In Ukraine this indicator is forecasted for the year 2003 on the level of 5.5%
in comparison with 4.8 in 2002, in Byelorussia - 4.0%.
"Despite good indicators of growth within latest years, level of population's
incomes in non-raw stuff countries is still very low. Poverty is prevalent, and
countries in great degree depend on external sources of financing, often on
gratuitous basis ", - says the report.
EBRD called Moldavia and Georgia as the troubling examples, their cooperation
with IMF was in the year 2003 interrupted because of problems with fulfillment
of obligations concerned with economic reformation. It complicated the
beginning of negotiations with Paris club about debt restructuring, which was
extremely important for both Kishinev and Tbilisi.
EBRD notes that in the mid-term outlook non-raw stuff countries should solve
the problem of dependence on Russia's market and energy carriers supply. In
the opinion of EBRD's experts, high oil prices, which are kept for last several
years, almost was not reflected in economic growth rate sin the region. This
paradox is explained by the fact that non-market mechanisms prevail in
settlements for energy carriers inside CIS, and prices can not be called market
ones.
Besides, high dependence on Russia's market results so that after growth of
prices for oil demand for import from these countries will also grow among
Russian consumers.
EBRD considers that as purchasing capacity will grow Russian people will re-
orient on more expensive but more high-quality goods. This process may play
positive role for non-raw stuff countries, which have to increase their
production's quality.
However bank's experts warn that the subsidized export of energy carriers from
Russia and other countries rich with oil and gas will end sooner or later that
may make irreparable damage for "non-raw stuff" economies.
[2003-11-18]